Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attach views back in series instead of async #506

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2015

Conversation

purusho
Copy link
Contributor

@purusho purusho commented Nov 18, 2015

When using rendr with requirejs in AMD mode the child views are attached with null as parent on the first render. Because we are waiting for the module to be loaded . This change is to forcefully attach the views in series.

@alexindigo
Copy link
Member

👍

@alexindigo
Copy link
Member

@rendrjs/maintainers Can you take a look please? AMD gods will appreciate it :)

@ingiulio
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@saponifi3d
Copy link
Contributor

Seems okay, @jmerrifield might want to try it out with browserify to verify it doesn't break that one too :) yay amd vs commonjs.

@alexindigo
Copy link
Member

@saponifi3d Sorry, I got carried away with work things and lagging behind on testing app. (Looking forward for the holidays). :)

@saponifi3d
Copy link
Contributor

No worries. I haven't had time to get to it yet either. :'(

@alexindigo
Copy link
Member

@jmerrifield Any news on browserify front? :) Thanks.

@jmerrifield
Copy link
Contributor

Haven't had a chance to check this yet, and won't be back at work until Monday to do so. I think this change will be totally fine though, probably no need to wait on me :)

saponifi3d added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2015
Attach views back in series instead of async
@saponifi3d saponifi3d merged commit 554984e into rendrjs:master Dec 4, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants