Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Array.joinWith -> Array.join #205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2024
Merged

Array.joinWith -> Array.join #205

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

cknitt
Copy link
Collaborator

@cknitt cknitt commented Apr 1, 2024

No description provided.

@cknitt cknitt force-pushed the array-join branch 5 times, most recently from 5c94569 to ffe9de0 Compare April 1, 2024 13:30
@zth
Copy link
Collaborator

zth commented Apr 1, 2024

I think this might be a bit problematic. While more correct, we're making the most common use case by far, which is passing an arg, more cumbersome to do.

I think we should just rename to join and have the arg still be an unlabeled string. That's the most common operation.

@cknitt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cknitt commented Apr 1, 2024

Fine with me, too! Will update the PR.

@cknitt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cknitt commented Apr 1, 2024

@zth Done! Please re-review. And could you also have a look at #201?

@cknitt cknitt merged commit dedd5f6 into main Apr 1, 2024
6 checks passed
@cknitt cknitt deleted the array-join branch April 1, 2024 19:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants