Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow Pillow version 6.x in setup.py #147

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Allow Pillow version 6.x in setup.py #147

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

theskumar
Copy link
Contributor

Although changelog[1] says v1.10 added support for Pillow 6.x, setup.py still install Pillow <6. This commit fixes this.

[1] https://github.com/respondcreate/django-versatileimagefield/blob/master/docs/index.rst#110

Allow Pillow version 6.x in setup.py
8479948 
Although changelog[1] says v1.10 added support for Pillow 6.x, setup.py still install Pillow <6. This commit fixes this. 

[1] https://github.com/respondcreate/django-versatileimagefield/blob/master/docs/index.rst#110
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8479948 on theskumar:patch-2 into d41e279 on respondcreate:master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8479948 on theskumar:patch-2 into d41e279 on respondcreate:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8479948 on theskumar:patch-2 into d41e279 on respondcreate:master.

@tucosaurus tucosaurus mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2019
Merged
@tucosaurus
Copy link

tucosaurus commented Oct 24, 2019 •
edited
Loading

@respondcreate @perhapsspy Any chance we can merge this in ?

CuriousLearner referenced this pull request in Fueled/django-init Nov 14, 2019
@tucosaurus
chore - update pillow due to security vulnerability (#379)
ca1b415
@CuriousLearner
Copy link

Hi @perhapsspy

Can we please merge this in?

cc @respondcreate

@NyanKiyoshi
Copy link
Contributor

In 1.10 the constraint was totally removed. So it's all good now. The commit: 40a5f82

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@perhapsspy perhapsspy perhapsspy approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@theskumar @coveralls @tucosaurus @CuriousLearner @NyanKiyoshi @perhapsspy @respondcreate