Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compilation fails on clang 3.2 #1006

Closed
srh opened this issue Jun 13, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

Compilation fails on clang 3.2 #1006

srh opened this issue Jun 13, 2013 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@srh
Copy link
Contributor

srh commented Jun 13, 2013

Lots of compilation errors in clang 3.2 suddenly got added to next. I will fix them (since I'm using clang 3.2).

@ghost ghost assigned srh Jun 13, 2013
@jdoliner
Copy link
Contributor

Which clang do we have on newton these days? I thought it was 3.2.
On Jun 13, 2013 9:52 AM, "srh" notifications@github.com wrote:

Lots of compilation errors in clang 3.2 suddenly got added to next. I will
fix them (since I'm using clang 3.2).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1006
.

@coffeemug
Copy link
Contributor

ccoffeemug@newton:~$ clang --version
clang version 3.2 (tags/RELEASE_32/final)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix

Rethink definitely builds on newton. @srh -- what are the errors you're
seeing?

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Joe Doliner notifications@github.comwrote:

Which clang do we have on newton these days? I thought it was 3.2.
On Jun 13, 2013 9:52 AM, "srh" notifications@github.com wrote:

Lots of compilation errors in clang 3.2 suddenly got added to next. I
will
fix them (since I'm using clang 3.2).

?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/1006>
.

?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1006#issuecomment-19408670
.

@srh
Copy link
Contributor Author

srh commented Jun 13, 2013

This was fixed by the changes made in 1.6.x.

@srh srh closed this as completed Jun 13, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants