Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Web UI: Reconfigure should block the UI while adding/removing shards/replicas #4107

Closed
thelinuxlich opened this issue Apr 23, 2015 · 8 comments
Milestone

Comments

@thelinuxlich
Copy link

If I go too fast I end up with the UI showing the new number of replicas but seconds after it returns to the old state.

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

@thelinuxlich can you explain a bit more which steps you take and where in the web UI you first see the new and then again the old number of replicas? Are you doing the reconfiguration over the web UI or through a reconfigure query?

@thelinuxlich
Copy link
Author

I'm doing it over the web UI, when I add more replicas and click "Apply configuration" it closes the modal, updates the number of replicas, but sometimes after a few seconds it returns to the old number of replicas.

@thelinuxlich
Copy link
Author

I've noticed that it won't happen if I expand the "where's my data going?" panel and wait for it to show the new results and only after it click on "Apply configuration"

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the clarification @thelinuxlich

@deontologician you remember when we had the number of replicas on the tables page flicker between including the offloading data replicas and the actual correct number? Maybe this is the same issue.

@danielmewes danielmewes added this to the 2.0.x milestone Apr 23, 2015
@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

I don't think we should block the UI by the way, we should just try to figure out what's going on with the number of replica calculation/display.

@deontologician
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I remember this. I agree, we need to nail down the core issue

@danielmewes danielmewes modified the milestones: 2.1-polish, 2.0.x Aug 6, 2015
@danielmewes danielmewes modified the milestones: subsequent, 2.1-polish Aug 18, 2015
@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

Just realized that this is the same issue as #4858. The good news is that we mostly understand what's happening.

@danielmewes
Copy link
Member

Merging with #4858.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants