Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

{ x , - ∞ , + ∞ }] ; – Edit #1645

Closed
wants to merge 4,145 commits into from
Closed

{ x , - ∞ , + ∞ }] ; – Edit #1645

wants to merge 4,145 commits into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 14, 2013

{ x , - ∞ , + ∞ }] ; – Edit

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 14, 2013

{ x , - ∞ , + ∞ }] ; – Edit

1 similar comment
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 14, 2013

{ x , - ∞ , + ∞ }] ; – Edit

Marc Hesse and others added 28 commits March 6, 2014 04:34
integrating cache rebalancing throughout the stack
8079094
fixing code review comments
c8cb3c2
@srh
Removed thick_list.hpp.
7beb28e
@srh
Merge branch 'next' into sam_thicklist
1c25cae
@srh
Merge branch 'sam_thicklist' into next
9022999
@srh
Added unused stub timestamped_page_ptr_t.
900b72e
Restart read-ahead if the cache size has been increased and the cache…
b882155 
… isn't full yet.
removing cache config, adding a dummy cache balancer, and making cach…
44fe1f0 
…e balancer mandatory
removing cache_size from drivers and polyglot tests
be6122e
Merge branch 'next' into grey_issue_97
3e6ceca
Merge branch 'daniel_issue_97_read_ahead' into grey_issue_97
184b5e2
@srh
Made current_page_acq_t use timestamped_page_ptr_t.
a7e3ead
code review fixed for cache balancer
01dfb0a
@srh
Made buf_lock_t::get_recency wait for read access.
66b7eb0
@srh
Made recencies computed upon access, not upon current_page_acq_t cons…
b6504ae 
…truction.
@srh
Fixed assertion in timestamped_page_ptr_t to allow deleted (NULL) pag…
28be827 
…e representation with invalid timestamp.
@srh
A slight refactoring of pulse_pulsables recency values.
a4dbc3d
@srh
Removed the recency_ field from current_page_acq_t.
7c742be
@srh
Added unused manually_touch_recency method.
343bd9b
Fix bring_sindexes_up_to_date
1fcb7fb
code review fixed for cache balancer
258ba73
Merge branch 'grey_issue_97' of github.com:rethinkdb/rethinkdb into g…
8ac6598 
…rey_issue_97
@srh
Made btree split, merge, level, and root insertion operations manuall…
eb7c215 
…y touch the recency.
@srh
Found a cleaner way to construct loop.
f6a553c
@srh
Fixed new root block manually_touch_recency call to use recency value…
c80c0df 
… and not crash.
@srh
Removed or renamed some "temp" bufs.
fc0be47
@srh
Added write-cond waiting for write acquirers in recency() to make vie…
f03ee2b 
…w of recency consistent.
tweaking cache rebalance algorithm, updated spin_up_cluster to specif…
7c8ea4e 
…y cache-size
@AtnNn AtnNn closed this Mar 22, 2014
@AtnNn AtnNn added this to the invalid milestone Feb 16, 2017
This was referenced Mar 12, 2020
Open
Open
This was referenced Oct 20, 2020
Open
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2021
Open
This was referenced Sep 12, 2021
Open
Open
Open
@enterstudio enterstudio mentioned this pull request May 13, 2022
Open
@ferreiramarcelo ferreiramarcelo mentioned this pull request May 13, 2022
Open
@DhavalW DhavalW mentioned this pull request May 14, 2022
Open
@enterstudio enterstudio mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2022
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2022
Open
@DhavalW DhavalW mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2022
Open
@ferreiramarcelo ferreiramarcelo mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023
Open
@DhavalW DhavalW mentioned this pull request Jun 21, 2023
Open
@enterstudio enterstudio mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2023
Open
@ferreiramarcelo ferreiramarcelo mentioned this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Open
@DhavalW DhavalW mentioned this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Open
@enterstudio enterstudio mentioned this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Open
@ferreiramarcelo ferreiramarcelo mentioned this pull request May 13, 2024
Open
@DhavalW DhavalW mentioned this pull request May 13, 2024
Open
@enterstudio enterstudio mentioned this pull request May 13, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
invalid
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@AtnNn @srh @mlucy @neumino @Aleaxander @Tryneus @danielmewes