Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using documentation's example, Closes #7 #8

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

m-242
Copy link
Collaborator

@m-242 m-242 commented Jun 17, 2020

No description provided.

@m-242 m-242 changed the title Using documentation's example, closes #7 Using documentation's example, Closes #7 Jun 17, 2020
@m-242 m-242 linked an issue Jun 17, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
@m-242
Copy link
Collaborator Author

m-242 commented Jun 17, 2020

The codebase needs linting, but the PR is only failing because it introduces static checking.
Irony

@rfc2119
Copy link
Owner

rfc2119 commented Jun 17, 2020

sobs in Go
10/10 👌

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
name: reviewdog
on: [pull_request]
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we are doing a "lint" workflow on master (or dev, I can't remember), then shouldn't we add those too (i.e the ones already added in the other workflow) ?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Having two different workflows allows them to run in parallel, it's faster this way. It could easily be added as a job to the lint workflow though, at the cost of waiting longer on pull requests automatic tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

static check for more linting super powers
2 participants