Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Repository New_Repository has no mirror or baseurl (#1215963) #128

Closed

Conversation

jkonecny12
Copy link
Member

Source spoke is set to error state instead of crash with empty
repository.
"URL is empty" warning message is now working correctly. It shows
if new repository is created or url is not set.

Resolves: rhbz#1215963

Source spoke is set to error state instead of crash with empty
repository.
"URL is empty" warning message is now working correctly. It shows
if new repository is created or url is not set.

Resolves: rhbz#1215963
@jkonecny12 jkonecny12 added the master Please, use the `f39` label instead. label Jun 4, 2015
@@ -1328,6 +1328,8 @@ def on_addRepo_clicked(self, button):
self._repoSelection.select_iter(itr)
self._repoEntryBox.set_sensitive(True)

self._repoURLChecks[repo].update_check_status()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the Python 3 repo is not hashable and we use repo.name as the key. Just please sync with @M4rtinK to make sure whatever goes last has this glitch fixed.

@vpodzime
Copy link
Contributor

vpodzime commented Jun 5, 2015

Looks good to me otherwise.

@vpodzime vpodzime added the ACK label Jun 5, 2015
@dashea
Copy link
Contributor

dashea commented Jun 19, 2015

Other than the two comments this seems to work fine. Since it bypasses GUIInputCheck, the delayed check changes don't affect it. It might be possible to make the addon repo checks use the delay, but that's something we can look at later.

@jkonecny12
Copy link
Member Author

Will be reworked and after that new PR will be created (with the link to this one :) ).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
master Please, use the `f39` label instead.
3 participants