Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bad sensitivity on boxes in source spoke (#1262833) #552

Conversation

jkonecny12
Copy link
Member

The boxes sensitivity for source types are changed when user clicks on radio button to change type of source.
Fix problem when user enter source spoke -> nothing were clicked and everything is sensitive.

EDIT:
Remove default sensitivity on Network box. It caused more gtk boxes were sensitive in one time.
Enable network button when we have functional connectivity.

Reported-by: Pavel Holica pholica@redhat.com

Resolves: rhbz#1262833

I don't know why but it doesn't happened on rawhide/f24 so this is rhel7 only.

@vpodzime
Copy link
Contributor

I think all the boxes should be made insensitive first and then one of the radio buttons should be activated ("clicked from code").

@jkonecny12
Copy link
Member Author

I completely reworked this patch. I think this is happening because we are setting up default value.

I tried test with network, iso repo and without repo and it looks it works correctly now.

Remove default sensitivity on Network box. It caused more gtk boxes were
sensitive in one time.
Enable network button when we have functional connectivity.

Reported-by: Pavel Holica <pholica@redhat.com>

Resolves: rhbz#1262833
@jkonecny12
Copy link
Member Author

Updated again. I hope I fixed the root cause of this problem now.

@vpodzime
Copy link
Contributor

vpodzime commented Apr 1, 2016

Looks good to me.

@vpodzime vpodzime added the ACK label Apr 1, 2016
@jkonecny12
Copy link
Member Author

Pushed

@jkonecny12 jkonecny12 closed this Apr 1, 2016
@jkonecny12 jkonecny12 deleted the rhel7-fix-source-sensitivity branch April 1, 2016 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants