Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make validation optional #44

Closed
opoudjis opened this issue Feb 13, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Make validation optional #44

opoudjis opened this issue Feb 13, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
@opoudjis
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Nick Nicholas

Comments

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

opoudjis commented Feb 13, 2019 •
edited

For huge documents, such as NIST SP 800-53r4, validation potentially adds many minutes to execution time. @ronaldtse: Should we make validation of documents optional?
@opoudjis opoudjis added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 13, 2019
@opoudjis opoudjis self-assigned this Feb 13, 2019
@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

We definitely could, but we should definitely note that it is not recommended — unless the user really knows what’s going on with disabling validation.

@opoudjis opoudjis added this to High priority in Nick Nicholas Mar 9, 2019
@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is already in place: :novalid: flag. Making sure it is observed in all gems.

opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-generic that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
12a8cca
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-csa that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
b5860f4
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-csa that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
22133a6
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-cc that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
1b1ed5e
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-gb that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
c359bfa
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-gb that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
d07cbf2
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-m3aawg that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
b5fb201
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-mpfa that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
3db1373
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-mpfa that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
a5955e6
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-ogc that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
e1587d1
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-ribose that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
717a501
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-sample that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
e459d46
opoudjis added a commit to metanorma/metanorma-un that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
@opoudjis
conditional validation; metanorma/metanorma-standoc#44
80864a8
Nick Nicholas automation moved this from High priority to Closed Mar 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@opoudjis opoudjis

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
No open projects
Nick Nicholas
  
Closed
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ronaldtse @opoudjis