Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Q: Adjustment to tiny labeling mistake (ref Zemblys, 2018)? #2

Closed
adswa opened this issue Mar 8, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Q: Adjustment to tiny labeling mistake (ref Zemblys, 2018)? #2

adswa opened this issue Mar 8, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@adswa
Copy link
Contributor

adswa commented Mar 8, 2019

Zemblys et al., 2018, report a minor labeling mistake in one image file here (or a pay-wall free version here) in Appendix 2:

We found an obvious labeling mistake in the one of the validation trials (file UH29_img_Europe_labelled_MN. We fixed this error by reassigning 75 samples, [3197,3272) (zero-based index), from the saccade to the fixation class.

I checked the data file in question and it appears to still contain the erroneous saccade labels. Just to reconfirm: this labeling error has not been fixed in the data file in this repository, correct?

If you wish, I can PR a fixed file, the issue at hand is intended to just reconfirm my assumption.

Thanks in advance!

@richardandersson
Copy link
Owner

richardandersson commented Mar 8, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants