-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Q: Adjustment to tiny labeling mistake (ref Zemblys, 2018)? #2
Comments
adswa
added a commit
to adswa/remodnav
that referenced
this issue
Mar 8, 2019
adswa
added a commit
to adswa/remodnav
that referenced
this issue
Mar 8, 2019
Hi,
Yes, no, I have not fixed that file. Please PR a fixed file if you want,
but perhaps add it as a separate folder in case people want to replicate
exactly as the original paper, errors and all.
Cheers,
Richard
…On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:35 AM Adina Wagner ***@***.***> wrote:
Zemblys et al., 2018, report a minor labeling mistake in one image file
here <https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-018-1133-5> (or a
pay-wall free version here
<http://sci-hub.tw/https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-018-1133-5>)
in Appendix 2:
We found an obvious labeling mistake in the one of the validation trials
(file UH29_img_Europe_labelled_MN. We fixed this error by reassigning 75
samples, [3197,3272) (zero-based index), from the saccade to the fixation
class.
I checked the data file in question and it appears to still contain the
erroneous saccade labels. Just to reconfirm: this labeling error has not
been fixed in the data file in this repository, correct?
If you wish, I can PR a fixed file, the issue at hand is intended to just
reconfirm my assumption.
Thanks in advance!
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALrlKTHfrO0unZTzDIL-F4jLe3py7bC-ks5vUi7zgaJpZM4bk_Yv>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Zemblys et al., 2018, report a minor labeling mistake in one image file here (or a pay-wall free version here) in Appendix 2:
I checked the data file in question and it appears to still contain the erroneous saccade labels. Just to reconfirm: this labeling error has not been fixed in the data file in this repository, correct?
If you wish, I can PR a fixed file, the issue at hand is intended to just reconfirm my assumption.
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: