Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pokemon Team Planner Feedback #38

Open
K4136 opened this issue Jan 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Pokemon Team Planner Feedback #38

K4136 opened this issue Jan 5, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@K4136
Copy link

K4136 commented Jan 5, 2023

Love the site! Very good, lots of features. My only qualm is that there isn't an option for all generations, I get this is the point Home is supposed to serve, but the Home update isn't gonna happen for a while in S/V, so it's kinda upsetting. I'd also like to see some kind of "save" button, because although bookmarking inside a dedicated folder works, it's kinda bothersome. Other than that great site! Keep up the good work!

@K4136
Copy link
Author

K4136 commented Jan 17, 2023

Adding on to this, a feature to nickname the Pokémon would be nice, although I don't know how hard it would be.

@K4136
Copy link
Author

K4136 commented Jan 17, 2023

One more thing for right now, a way to set it, so only dual or monotypes are listed would also be nice, again I don't know if it'd be good to code. I think it'd probably be easier. The tool is great as is! Just suggesting some cool things.a

@The-Crimson-V
Copy link

One more thing for right now, a way to set it, so only dual or monotypes are listed would also be nice, again I don't know if it'd be good to code. I think it'd probably be easier. The tool is great as is! Just suggesting some cool things.a

I second this. I have a thing for specifically including dual-typed Pokemon on teams and having to sift through the list of mono-typed Pokemon makes it a little hard.

@A-b-e-l
Copy link

A-b-e-l commented May 8, 2023

Have to agree with this! Dual typed are so much better than monotype despite having extra weaknesses.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants