Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace refs in moving-time-window by an atom #811

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 26, 2017

Conversation

mcorbin
Copy link
Contributor

@mcorbin mcorbin commented Apr 28, 2017

Like #797, refs are replaced by an atom for performances.
I want to make some bench before merging.

@mcorbin mcorbin changed the title [DO not merge] Replace refs in moving-time-window by an atom [Do not merge] Replace refs in moving-time-window by an atom Apr 28, 2017
@mcorbin mcorbin force-pushed the feat/moving-time-window-atom branch from f2d33cb to 71f613f Compare June 6, 2017 18:56
@mcorbin mcorbin force-pushed the feat/moving-time-window-atom branch from 71f613f to 32fa155 Compare June 6, 2017 19:05
@mcorbin
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcorbin commented Jun 6, 2017

Some numbers, using riemann-bench on my laptop with this configuration:

(streams
 (default :ttl 300 (index))
 (moving-time-window 1)
 (moving-time-window 1)
 (moving-time-window 1)
 (moving-time-window 1)
 (moving-time-window 2)
 (moving-time-window 2)
 (moving-time-window 2)
 (moving-time-window 2))

bulk latency
single latency (not very useful ;) )
single throughtput
bulk throughtput

@mcorbin mcorbin changed the title [Do not merge] Replace refs in moving-time-window by an atom Replace refs in moving-time-window by an atom Jun 6, 2017
@jamtur01
Copy link
Member

Ping @pyr @aphyr

@aphyr
Copy link
Collaborator

aphyr commented Jun 26, 2017

Heck yes! Great work @mcorbin, long overdue. Your benchmarks look fantastic. :)

@jamtur01
Copy link
Member

Neato!

@jamtur01 jamtur01 merged commit 91cea03 into riemann:master Jun 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants