Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed naive_program_generator qubit selection problem #72

Merged
merged 10 commits into from Mar 27, 2019

Conversation

kylegulshen
Copy link
Contributor

@kylegulshen kylegulshen commented Mar 22, 2019

Previously if two consecutive indices in the provided qubits were not connected then the program generation would fail even if there were sufficiently many available qubits.

@kylegulshen kylegulshen requested a review from a team as a code owner March 22, 2019 00:01
@kylegulshen
Copy link
Contributor Author

kylegulshen commented Mar 22, 2019

@karalekas these tests pass and seem to be deterministic locally--any idea they would fail? Does the seeding work differently non-locally?

@karalekas
Copy link
Contributor

@kylegulshen Do you want to make this UT less random seed sensitive before we proceed?

@kylegulshen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok I fixed it. Only one of the parts was sensitive.

@karalekas karalekas added this to the v0.3 milestone Mar 25, 2019
@karalekas karalekas self-requested a review March 27, 2019 17:18
@karalekas karalekas merged commit 4edb409 into master Mar 27, 2019
@karalekas karalekas deleted the quantum-volume-index-bug branch March 27, 2019 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants