Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: update Quil-T docs to use get_calibration_program() name #1389

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2021

Conversation

notmgsk
Copy link
Contributor

@notmgsk notmgsk commented Oct 5, 2021

Description

Fix references to qc.compiler.calibration_program -> qc.compiler.get_calibration_program()

Checklist

  • The PR targets the rc branch (not master).
  • Commit messages are prefixed with one of the prefixes outlined in the commit syntax checker (see pattern field).
  • The above description motivates these changes.
  • There is a unit test that covers these changes.
  • All new and existing tests pass locally and on the PR's checks.
  • Parameters and return values have type hints with PEP 484 syntax.
  • Functions and classes have useful Sphinx-style docstrings.
  • All code follows Black style and obeys flake8 conventions.
  • (New Feature) The docs have been updated accordingly.
  • (Bugfix) The associated issue is referenced above using auto-close keywords.
  • The changelog is updated, including author and PR number (@username, Test ignore #1234).

@notmgsk notmgsk requested a review from a team as a code owner October 5, 2021 17:48
@notmgsk notmgsk merged commit 2d11e3e into rc Oct 12, 2021
@rigetti-githubbot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.0.1-rc.3 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@rigetti-githubbot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.0.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@dbanty dbanty deleted the 1386-update-calibrations-naming-2.0 branch February 14, 2022 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants