Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look into replacing cinchize... #43

Open
rikai opened this issue Feb 14, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Look into replacing cinchize... #43

rikai opened this issue Feb 14, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@rikai
Copy link
Owner

rikai commented Feb 14, 2016

Cinchize is a module that hasn't been updated in several years at this point. It's also appears to be the source of issues with some cinch plugins.

Do we really still need it? If we do, are there any good alternatives? What would we need to do to remove or replace it?

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

@s0ph0s-2
Copy link

Ruby-RBot looks promising. It also already has a web server built in.
The syntax for plugin commands is different, however. It wouldn't be possible to directly port many of JBot's plugins, and all of them would require small changes.
Additionally, I wasn't able to directly identify an MVC-like architecture after initial examination. This may be indicative of potential implementation issues, should Cinch be replaced.

@rikai
Copy link
Owner Author

rikai commented Jul 24, 2016

I'm not looking to replace cinch, just possibly cinchize. The cinch framework works well for what we need, but cinchize causes some complications sometimes. Not sure what discontinuing it's use would lose us though

@s0ph0s-2
Copy link

Ah, I didn't pick up on the fact that cinch and cinchize were different projects.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants