add cassandra sink doc #1318
Merged
add cassandra sink doc #1318
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more). |
emile-00
reviewed
Sep 20, 2023
emile-00
reviewed
Sep 20, 2023
|
Thanks. LGTM |
neverchanje
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Info
Description
Add a guide about sinking data to Cassandra / ScyllaDB.
Notes
[ Include any supplementary context or references here. ]
Related code PR
feat(sink): Support cassandra sink risingwave#11878
Related doc issue
Resolves Document: feat(sink): Support cassandra sink #1275
For reviewers
Preview
[ Paste the preview link to the updated page(s) here. Edit this item after the preview site is ready. To find the updated pages, scroll down to locate and open the Amplify preview link and select the upcoming version of the documentation. ]
Key points
[ Parts that may need revision or extra consideration. ]
Before merging
I have checked the doc site preview, and the updated parts look good.
I have acquired the approval from the owner (and optionally the reviewers) of the code PR and at least one tech writer (
CharlieSYH,emile-00, &hengm3467).