feat(over window): support batch over window

[stdrc]

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

This PR adds support for over window in batch mode, which fixes #10016 and fixes #9931.

Checklist

• I have written necessary rustdoc comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• [ ] I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
• [ ] My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
• All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
• [ ] My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)

• [ ] My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the [details](https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md))

Documentation

• My PR contains user-facing changes.

Click here for Documentation

Types of user-facing changes

Please keep the types that apply to your changes, and remove the others.

• SQL commands, functions, and operators

Release note

• Support over window functions like lead, lad in batch mode

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #10915 (1767ecf) into main (33071ff) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 47.67%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10915      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.95%   69.92%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1307     1309       +2     
  Lines      223475   223714     +239     
==========================================
+ Hits       156327   156429     +102     
- Misses      67148    67285     +137     

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust	69.92% <47.67%> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/batch/src/executor/mod.rs	78.37% <ø> (ø)
src/batch/src/executor/sort_over_window.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/frontend/src/optimizer/plan_node/mod.rs	92.97% <ø> (ø)
src/meta/src/hummock/metrics_utils.rs	70.61% <0.00%> (-3.33%)	⬇️
src/meta/src/manager/catalog/fragment.rs	27.85% <0.00%> (-0.35%)	⬇️
src/meta/src/rpc/server.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/meta/src/hummock/manager/mod.rs	68.16% <29.62%> (-0.27%)	⬇️
...ntend/src/optimizer/plan_node/batch_over_window.rs	62.29% <62.29%> (ø)
src/meta/src/rpc/metrics.rs	78.54% <63.33%> (-0.71%)	⬇️
...end/src/optimizer/plan_node/logical_over_window.rs	92.70% <89.74%> (-0.25%)	⬇️
... and 7 more

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[st1page]

Generally LGTM

[st1page]

The Exchange can not make the OverWindow's computing can not be shuffled well because the partition key in a period could be the same.
a better plan might be

        └─BatchOverWindow { window_functions: [row_number() OVER(PARTITION BY t.y ORDER BY t.x ASC ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING)] }
            └─BatchSort { order: [t.y ASC, t.x ASC] }
                     └─BatchExchange { dist: HashShard(t.y) }