You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Institutions: We have $i in 510 for Relationship information. It's a free-text field and the guidelines give some suggestions. The field might be easier to use if this were a drop-down list and more explicitly aligned with the RDA Agent Properties (https://www.rdaregistry.info/Elements/a/).
For example, encode rdaa:P50008 "has hierarchical superior" for Hierarchical superior
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also note that the list of Agent properties has translations in 16 languages.
I think we can start with the properties given in the guidelines:
rdaa:P50008 | Hierarchical superior
rdaa:P50010 | Hierarchical subordinate
rdaa:P50012 | Predecessor of corporate body
rdaa:P50016 | Successor of corporate body
rdaa:P50020 | Founding family of corporate body
rdaa:P50230 | Corporate body member of corporate body
rdaa:P50435 | Corporate body member of family
rdaa:P50301 | Absorbed corporate body
In Institutions: We have $i in 510 for Relationship information. It's a free-text field and the guidelines give some suggestions. The field might be easier to use if this were a drop-down list and more explicitly aligned with the RDA Agent Properties (https://www.rdaregistry.info/Elements/a/).
For example, encode
rdaa:P50008
"has hierarchical superior" for Hierarchical superiorThoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: