-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Be smarter about cardinal-direction exits? #136
Comments
Reuven noted, out of band, two other advantages to the first method: it's more discoverable, and it doesn't result in two things which appear to be the same type of object actually not being so. |
Another UI I've seen for this is a "dig mode" where you can move around normally, but walking through a cardinal exit that doesn't exist digs a room and opens exits both ways, then drops you into the new room. So you can walk around your map creating it as you go. We may or may not want to implement that exactly, but maybe take it as design inspiration. |
Yeah, I've used that too -- Circle has it -- and I think we've talked about it. It's useful for digging out a big area before you begin writing it (or, more charitably, when you've already written it and are just going to be pasting descriptions in). I don't feel strongly either way about implementing it, except in that it's a fair bit of work to do for something nobody feels strongly about. :P Upon reflection, what about a mix of these suggestions: use a special command for this, but one room at a time, e.g. |
Using N/S/E/W etc. as exits is likely to be so common that it should be easy and not require as much boilerplate to make work as it currently does. Things we can automate away:
I can think of two ways to spot the instances when we want to do this:
autodig
, maybe?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: