IVRE integration #742
Merged
IVRE integration #742
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…r Quantil filtering
no-capture
Run unit tests on Github Actions & fix tests
README: add badges
Sync with upstream
ivre-masscan integration This pulls a bunch of changes from https://github.com/ivre/masscan.
Update README.md
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This integrations a ton of changes from the https://github.com/ivre fork of masscan. A bunch of things from that branch have been modified.
The biggest change is a complete rewrite of the "reconnect" feature first proposed by Frky. I've completely re-done the TCP stack to support it better. The feature is labeled with the keyword "reconnect" throughout so you can see the changes.
I've also completely redone the
--tcpmssfeature, now supporting the arbitrary change/addition of many TCP options. Frankly, the code not having an MSS field to begin with was always broken. I don't know it never did.I'm going to do a lot more testing once this is back in the
masterbranch, so expect a lot more changes in theintegrationbranch over the next couple months.