Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added ContentResolver.getType() shadow implementation and test cases #954

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dbreese
Copy link
Contributor

@dbreese dbreese commented Feb 8, 2014

ContentResolver.getType() was not being called properly and was returning null.

See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/robolectric/I5z5N5NH4Pw

@erd erd closed this in 63ea99f Feb 8, 2014
@dbreese
Copy link
Contributor Author

dbreese commented Feb 12, 2014

Hey, Erich, not sure I understand why this was closed instead of merged? I implemented ShadowContentResolver.getType() and test cases for it. Did I screw something up or is there a better way?

@JurgenCruz
Copy link
Contributor

I think it was merged. But it was merged manually and github thinks it is just closed not merged.

@dbreese
Copy link
Contributor Author

dbreese commented Feb 12, 2014

Ah, thanks, SuperJugy!

@erd
Copy link
Member

erd commented Feb 12, 2014

@dbreese I tend to merge things by hand with 'git am' so I can fix minor formatting problems without having to kick a PR back to the submitter. You should still be marked as the author of the PR, but github's UI doesn't always reflect this.

dlam pushed a commit to hulu/robolectric that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants