Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve the evaluation of the human likeliness of the performed movement #35

Closed
vvasco opened this issue Apr 13, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Improve the evaluation of the human likeliness of the performed movement #35

vvasco opened this issue Apr 13, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
@vvasco
Labels
🗣 discussion A place where to discuss a specific argument 🚀 enhancement New feature or request 💡 idea An idea to bear in mind

Comments

@vvasco
Copy link

vvasco commented Apr 13, 2018

At the current stage (#3), only static joints are used to evaluate the human likeliness of the performed movement. Including dynamic joints in the evaluation can provide useful information (i.e. if the movement is performed correctly) and improve the human likeliness evaluation.
@vvasco vvasco added the 🗣 discussion A place where to discuss a specific argument label Apr 13, 2018
@vvasco vvasco self-assigned this Apr 13, 2018
@vvasco vvasco mentioned this issue Apr 13, 2018
Closed
@robotology robotology deleted a comment from vvasco Apr 13, 2018
@pattacini pattacini added 🚀 enhancement New feature or request 💡 idea An idea to bear in mind labels Apr 13, 2018
@pattacini
Copy link
Member

I think this is included in #61.
@vvasco can we close it then?

@vvasco
Copy link
Author

vvasco commented May 4, 2018

Yes, it is evaluated using the derivative of the computed RoM, which is also checked to lie within the minimum and the maximum values defined in the repertoire

@vvasco vvasco closed this as completed May 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@vvasco vvasco

Labels
🗣 discussion A place where to discuss a specific argument 🚀 enhancement New feature or request 💡 idea An idea to bear in mind
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pattacini @vvasco