-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make it easier to syntactically wrap another combinator. #49
Comments
Equivalent to |
I didn't realize this equivalence and wrote a custom |
|
I probably spent far too much time thinking about it after iterating through wrap, quote, etc. |
Is this still necessary given #91? (namely |
Probably not; closing. |
For example parenthesized expressions. The parens are syntactically important but don’t contribute to the tree; the wrapped combinator’s result should therefore be passed through, and the wrapping terms should be dropped.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: