Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JNB: Improve basic notebooks #279

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Mar 25, 2022

Conversation

scottclowe
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@scottclowe scottclowe added the doc label Mar 25, 2022
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 25, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #279 (5924f15) into master (4f45eda) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #279   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.08%   94.08%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines        1217     1217           
  Branches      313      313           
=======================================
  Hits         1145     1145           
  Misses         36       36           
  Partials       36       36           
Flag Coverage Δ
nbsmoke 60.06% <ø> (-0.17%) ⬇️
unittests 93.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4f45eda...5924f15. Read the comment docs.

@scottclowe scottclowe merged commit 8da03e2 into rochefort-lab:master Mar 25, 2022
@scottclowe scottclowe deleted the jnb_improve-description branch March 25, 2022 03:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant