docs: Basic punctuation corrections

[yashpandey06]

Author checklist (Completed by original Author)

• Good fit for the Rocky Linux project? Title and Author Metatags inserted ?
• If applicable, steps and instructions have been tested to work
• Initial self-review to fix basic typos and grammar completed

Rocky Documentation checklist (Completed by Rocky team)

• 1st Pass (Document is good fit for project and author checklist completed)
• 2nd Pass (Technical Review - check for technical correctness)
• 3rd Pass (Detailed Editorial Review and Peer Review)
• Final approval (Final Review)

[github-actions]

Test results for 2b3c965:

Number of broken URLs: 2

URL,RESULT,FILENAME
 https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/beginners-guide-to-lxd-reverse-proxy,failed,guides/containers/lxd_web_servers.md
 https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started,failed,guides/communications/asterisk_installation.md

[sspencerwire]

Hey, thank you for your work @yashpandey06 ... @alemorvan would you mind taking a look at this? I know that he is correct that, while originally using either "" or "-" for bulleted items, that the current accepted method is "-" I think the replacement of the "***" with three dashes is incorrect however. Looks like a lot of the changes are OK. Let me know what you think.

[yashpandey06]

@sspencerwire let me know if it's incorrect I will close this pr and raise another one

[sspencerwire]

@sspencerwire let me know if it's incorrect I will close this pr and raise another one

Actually, material-mkdocs (what we use) makes no distinction for drawing a line. Markdown appears to accept it as either "***" or "---" as you have changed it. I can't find the most accepted method, but they both work today. @yashpandey06 Do you use a local copy of documentation so that you can see how your changes affect the web rendering? I'm referring to one of these options. It's not required, however it does help me to know that the changes you've proposed here actually render correctly. Let me know either way. I can always revert some changes if it turns out to have broken something.

[yashpandey06]

@sspencerwire I don't see it to be broken , so its working ....any what's your point on it !, should I close the pr do it accordingly?

[sspencerwire]

@sspencerwire I don't see it to be broken , so its working ....any what's your point on it !, should I close the pr do it accordingly?

No, not yet. Let's see if @alemorvan comments back, if you are OK with waiting just a bit.

[yashpandey06]

@sspencerwire I don't see it to be broken , so its working ....any what's your point on it !, should I close the pr do it accordingly?

No, not yet. Let's see if @alemorvan comments back, if you are OK with waiting just a bit.

Sure 😄

[sspencerwire]

Hey, thank you for your work @yashpandey06 ... @alemorvan would you mind taking a look at this? I know that he is correct that, while originally using either "" or "-" for bulleted items, that the current accepted method is "-" I think the replacement of the "***" with three dashes is incorrect however. Looks like a lot of the changes are OK. Let me know what you think.

Actually, @yashpandey06, I was traveling before and could not check. Unordered lists are preferred to be * not -, so I misspoke above. Do you want to edit your PR? Thanks!

[sspencerwire]

Hey, thank you for your work @yashpandey06 ... @alemorvan would you mind taking a look at this? I know that he is correct that, while originally using either "" or "-" for bulleted items, that the current accepted method is "-" I think the replacement of the "***" with three dashes is incorrect however. Looks like a lot of the changes are OK. Let me know what you think.

Actually, @yashpandey06, I was traveling before and could not check. Unordered lists are preferred to be * not -, so I misspoke above. Do you want to edit your PR? Thanks!

OK, ignore my last (above): The problem I was seeing in the document I was editing was that the unordered list items had "mixed" formatting. The markdownlint requires you to pick one (- or *) and then stick with it throughout. So again, neither is wrong.

[yashpandey06]

@sspencerwire got it !

[alemorvan]

Let's see how it looks like