Hello Ines

The sentence « under the heading » derives  ce from IANA ´s recommended formulation.
Apart from that I’ll make your proposed changes as well as Alvaro’s in github, and publish later with Alvaro’s review if that’s ok with you?
About code 8 we’ll great catch; as you say IANA will fix that, but I can always suggest a new one.

All the best,

Pascal

Le 3 janv. 2023 à 22:00, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> a écrit :

Many thanks Pascal for addressing the comments, found minor issues in version 31 (apologizes if I miss them in version 30).

Section 11.2: "...under the heading "Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)", should it be " ..under the header "IPv6 Low Power Personal Area Network Parameters".." based on
https://www.iana.org/assignments/_6lowpan-parameters/_6lowpan-parameters.xhtml#elective-6lowpan-routing-header-type

Same as section 11.3: "...under the heading "Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)", should it be " ..under the header "IPv6 Low Power Personal Area Network Parameters".." based on
https://www.iana.org/assignments/_6lowpan-parameters/_6lowpan-parameters.xhtml#critical-6lowpan-routing-header-type

Section 11.15:

1- ..ICMPv6 Code Fields Registry --> ICMPv6 "Code" Fields Registry
2- ICMPv6 Message Type 1 --> ICMPv6 Message Type 1 "Destination Unreachable" ?
3- The code 8 is already assigned to "Headers too long" [ RFC8883], but I think IANA can assign another code number

Section 11.16: Statuss --> Status

Many thanks and Happy New Year

Ines.