Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-26:…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
… (with COMMENT)

Hello Murray:

Many thanks for your review! I made a pass of cleanup in the terminology.

Keep safe;

Pascal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Murray Kucherawy via
> Datatracker
> Sent: jeudi 17 décembre 2020 09:09
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves@ietf.org; roll-chairs@ietf.org; roll@ietf.org
> Subject: [Roll] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-
> leaves-26: (with COMMENT)
>
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-26: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The shepherd writeup says "With these reviews and discussions -15 is ready for
> IESG review."  But -23 was last called, and this is version -26.  Just checking... is
> this all still current?
>
> Though it is present in the glossary in Section 2.2, I don't see "AR" anywhere in
> this document.  The glossary also needs to be sorted again.
>
>
  • Loading branch information
pthubert committed Dec 17, 2020
1 parent a2ac00f commit d0eabd0
Showing 1 changed file with 7 additions and 6 deletions.
13 changes: 7 additions & 6 deletions unaware-leaves.xml
Expand Up @@ -265,8 +265,6 @@
<section anchor='gloss'><name>Glossary</name>
<t> This document uses the following acronyms:
</t><dl spacing='compact'>
<dt>AR:</dt><dd> Address Resolution (aka Address Lookup) </dd>
<dt>ARQ:</dt><dd> Automatic Repeat reQuest</dd>
<dt>6CIO:</dt><dd> 6LoWPAN Capability Indication Option</dd>
<dt>6LN:</dt><dd> 6LoWPAN Node (a Low Power host or router) </dd>
<dt>6LR:</dt><dd> 6LoWPAN router </dd>
Expand All @@ -275,9 +273,9 @@
<dt>(E)DAR:</dt><dd> (Extended) Duplicate Address Request </dd>
<dt>(E)DAC:</dt><dd> (Extended) Duplicate Address Confirmation </dd>
<dt>DAD:</dt><dd> Duplicate Address Detection </dd>
<dt>DAD:</dt><dd> Duplicate Address Detection </dd>
<dt>DAO:</dt><dd> Destination Advertisement Object (a RPL message) </dd>
<dt>DCO:</dt><dd> Destination Cleanup Object (a RPL message) </dd>
<dt>DIS:</dt><dd> DODAG Information solicitation (a RPL message) </dd>
<dt>DIO:</dt><dd> DODAG Information Object (a RPL message) </dd>
<dt>DODAG:</dt><dd> Destination-Oriented Directed Acyclic Graph </dd>
<dt>LLN:</dt><dd> Low-Power and Lossy Network </dd>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -323,7 +321,7 @@
information that RPL defines to be placed in data packets, e.g., as the RPL
Option <xref target='RFC6553'/> within the IPv6 Hop-By-Hop Header.
By extension, the term "RPI" is often used to refer to the RPL Option itself.
The DODAG Information solicitation (DIS), Destination Advertisement Object
The Destination Advertisement Object
(DAO) and DODAG Information Object (DIO) messages are also specified in
<xref target='RFC6550'/>. The Destination Cleanup Object (DCO) message
is defined in <xref target='I-D.ietf-roll-efficient-npdao'/>.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1899,8 +1897,11 @@ This specification leverages the Non-Storing DCO between the Root and the 6LR th
The authors wish to thank Ines Robles, Georgios Papadopoulos and
especially Rahul Jadhav and Alvaro Retana
for their reviews and contributions to this document.
Also many thanks to Elwyn Davies, Eric Vyncke,
Peter Van der Stok and Carl Wallace for their reviews and useful comments
Also many thanks to Eric Vyncke, Erik Kline, Murray Kucherawy,
Peter Van der Stok, Carl Wallace,
and especially Benjamin Kaduk and Elwyn Davies,

for their reviews and useful comments
during the IETF Last Call and the IESG review sessions.
</t>

Expand Down

0 comments on commit d0eabd0

Please sign in to comment.