Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-26:…
… (with COMMENT) Hello Murray: Many thanks for your review! I made a pass of cleanup in the terminology. Keep safe; Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Murray Kucherawy via > Datatracker > Sent: jeudi 17 décembre 2020 09:09 > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves@ietf.org; roll-chairs@ietf.org; roll@ietf.org > Subject: [Roll] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-unaware- > leaves-26: (with COMMENT) > > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-26: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The shepherd writeup says "With these reviews and discussions -15 is ready for > IESG review." But -23 was last called, and this is version -26. Just checking... is > this all still current? > > Though it is present in the glossary in Section 2.2, I don't see "AR" anywhere in > this document. The glossary also needs to be sorted again. > >
- Loading branch information