New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem in Band Structure Plotting #44
Comments
Shahid
Could you please post more info about your problem. Which code? How did you find your K-PATH? Etc… without that, it is hard to track the problem…
Thanks
…______________________::::__________________________________________
Prof. Aldo Humberto Romero
Fellow American Physical Society
Assistant Editor EPJB
Member of the Editor Board of “Materials”
Physics and Astronomy Department
West Virginia University
Phone: (304) 2936317
email: alromero@mail.wvu.edu
From: Shahid Sattar <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 6:26 AM
To: romerogroup/pyprocar <pyprocar@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Subject: [romerogroup/pyprocar] Problem in Band Structure Plotting (#44)
While plotting a band structure along the high-symmetry k-path K->Gamma-> Kp, I noticed that the k-path distances are not symmetrical around Gamma, which should not happen due to a hexagonal brillouin zone.
Can you please suggest any solution for this issue?
[Figure_6]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/61748682/106132217-f67d5e80-6163-11eb-8a10-7bb7561611cc.jpeg>
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#44>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB24DTM344FHVCOIAWJIUY3S4FCV3ANCNFSM4WW4PNEA>.
|
I used VASP for band structure calculation of a 2D hexagonal system, automatically generating the K-path:
|
Hello Shahid,
Are K and K’ symmetrically equivalent?
The distance between Gamma-K and Gamma-K’ are different based on your
K-path. Please correct me if I'm wrong
Best,
Uthpala
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:38 PM Shahid Sattar ***@***.***> wrote:
I used VASP for band structure calculation of a 2D hexagonal system,
automatically generating the K-path:
K-Points
35
line
reciprocal
0.33333333333 0.33333333333 0.00000000000 ! K
0.00000000000 0.00000000000 0.00000000000 ! \Gamma
0.00000000000 0.00000000000 0.00000000000 ! \Gamma
-0.33333333333 0.66666666667 0.00000000000 ! K'
-0.33333333333 0.66666666667 0.00000000000 ! K'
0.00000000000 0.50000000000 0.00000000000 ! M
0.00000000000 0.50000000000 0.00000000000 ! M
0.00000000000 0.00000000000 0.00000000000 ! \Gamma
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#44 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG3ZXMLUPFKTI3UFK6CP7Z3S4GOI3ANCNFSM4WW4PNEA>
.
--
Uthpala Herath
PhD Candidate
Department of Physics and Astronomy
West Virginia University
Morgantown, WV 26505
Tel. (304) 216-2535
Email: ukh0001@mix.wvu.edu <ukherathmudiyanselag@mix.wvu.edu>
Website: https://uthpalaherath.github.io/
|
Hi Uthpala, |
Ja!.. right
Your K’
-0.33333333333 0.66666666667 0.00000000000 ! K'
Is equivalent to
0.666666667 0.3333337 0.000000
Which is not equal to K
0.33333333333 0.33333333333 0.00000000000
______________________::::__________________________________________
Prof. Aldo Humberto Romero
Fellow American Physical Society
Assistant Editor EPJB
Member of the Editor Board of “Materials”
Physics and Astronomy Department
West Virginia University
Phone: (304) 2936317
email: alromero@mail.wvu.edu
From: Uthpala Herath <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 12:46 PM
To: romerogroup/pyprocar <pyprocar@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Aldo Romero <Aldo.Romero@mail.wvu.edu>, Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [romerogroup/pyprocar] Problem in Band Structure Plotting (#44)
Hello Shahid,
Are K and K’ symmetrically equivalent?
The distance between Gamma-K and Gamma-K’ are different based on your
K-path. Please correct me if I'm wrong
Best,
Uthpala
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:38 PM Shahid Sattar ***@***.***> wrote:
I used VASP for band structure calculation of a 2D hexagonal system,
automatically generating the K-path:
K-Points
35
line
reciprocal
! K
0.00000000000 0.00000000000 0.00000000000 ! \Gamma
0.00000000000 0.00000000000 0.00000000000 ! \Gamma
-0.33333333333 0.66666666667 0.00000000000 ! K'
-0.33333333333 0.66666666667 0.00000000000 ! K'
0.00000000000 0.50000000000 0.00000000000 ! M
0.00000000000 0.50000000000 0.00000000000 ! M
0.00000000000 0.00000000000 0.00000000000 ! \Gamma
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#44 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG3ZXMLUPFKTI3UFK6CP7Z3S4GOI3ANCNFSM4WW4PNEA>
.
--
Uthpala Herath
PhD Candidate
Department of Physics and Astronomy
West Virginia University
Morgantown, WV 26505
Tel. (304) 216-2535
Email: ukh0001@mix.wvu.edu <ukherathmudiyanselag@mix.wvu.edu>
Website: https://uthpalaherath.github.io/
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#44 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB24DTKC6QTB6IDVWYDTZWTS4GPHFANCNFSM4WW4PNEA>.
|
Shahid
They could be symmetrically the same but we are not taking that into account, the only symmetries we apply are based on the values you give from K and K’ and they are not the same point… of course, you can always use rotation to prove that K and K’ but we do not apply any point symmetry operations… we could do it in the future but right now we are reengineering the whole package to allow more properties to be implemented… this will have to wait…
…______________________::::__________________________________________
Prof. Aldo Humberto Romero
Fellow American Physical Society
Assistant Editor EPJB
Member of the Editor Board of “Materials”
Physics and Astronomy Department
West Virginia University
Phone: (304) 2936317
email: alromero@mail.wvu.edu
From: Shahid Sattar <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 12:48 PM
To: romerogroup/pyprocar <pyprocar@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Aldo Romero <Aldo.Romero@mail.wvu.edu>, Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [romerogroup/pyprocar] Problem in Band Structure Plotting (#44)
Hi Uthpala,
Yes, as it is a 2D system, K and K' are symmetrically equivalent.
In fact I plotted the same band structure using p4v and found K/K' at symmetrical distance to Gamma.
I also tried calculating the band structure separating K-G and G-K' and used combined PROCAR but it gives the same.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#44 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB24DTPGHMN6BJVPPQHKEU3S4GPOJANCNFSM4WW4PNEA>.
|
Thanks a lot for your prompt response.
|
I see. That option converts the coordinate system from reduced to
Cartesian.
I guess with the coordinate transformation they would become the same
point.
I’m glad it worked out for you.
Best,
Uthpala
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:54 PM Shahid Sattar ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks a lot for your prompt response.
Update:
I tried the option of kdirect=False and it worked. Now the distances are
equal from K-G and G-K'.
pyprocar.bandsplot('PROCAR',outcar='OUTCAR',elimit=[-2.5,2.5],kpointsfile='KPOINTS',cmap='jet',kdirect=False,mode='parametric',spin=1)
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#44 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG3ZXMINXQ6NFLUVKU6MKLDS4GQFJANCNFSM4WW4PNEA>
.
--
Uthpala Herath
PhD Candidate
Department of Physics and Astronomy
West Virginia University
Morgantown, WV 26505
Tel. (304) 216-2535
Email: ukh0001@mix.wvu.edu <ukherathmudiyanselag@mix.wvu.edu>
Website: https://uthpalaherath.github.io/
|
While plotting a band structure along the high-symmetry k-path K->Gamma-> Kp, I noticed that the k-path distances are not symmetrical around Gamma, which should not happen due to a hexagonal brillouin zone.
Can you please suggest any solution for this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: