Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a test to ensure that #492 is fixed #493

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

juntyr
Copy link
Member

@juntyr juntyr commented Aug 31, 2023

Fixes #492

* [ ] I've included my change in CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: Stumblinbear <stumblinbear@gmail.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (fdefa8f) 95.32% compared to head (3ae7e34) 95.33%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the GitHub App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #493   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.32%   95.33%           
=======================================
  Files          74       75    +1     
  Lines        9035     9054   +19     
=======================================
+ Hits         8613     8632   +19     
  Misses        422      422           
Files Changed Coverage Δ
tests/492_enum_in_untagged_enum.rs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@juntyr juntyr merged commit bc723e1 into ron-rs:master Aug 31, 2023
8 checks passed
@juntyr juntyr deleted the 492-test branch August 31, 2023 23:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Untagged enums don't deserialize newtype variants which are enums properly
2 participants