Adding AverageShape to daops

[charlesgauthier-udm]

Pull Request Checklist:

• [~] This PR addresses an already opened issue (for bug fixes / features)
  • This PR is related to this issue and is the continuation of this PR
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Documentation has been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
• HISTORY.rst has been updated (with summary of main changes)
• I have added my relevant user information to AUTHORS.md

• What kind of change does this PR introduce?:
  This PR adds the Spatial Averager operator to daops allowing to perform an average over a specified region

• Does this PR introduce a breaking change?:
  Not to my knowledge

• Other information:
  As it is, the shape parameter required by AverageShape is similar to the freq parameter of AverageTime in that it is only defined using the inputed argument. For the averqage across dimensions (Average), the dims parameter is defined as a dimension_parameter coming from roocs_utils. I was not sure if it was needed to add a shape_parameter to roocs_utils so I left it as is. If you feel like that would be preferable , please mention it in the PR and I'll add a shape_parameter to roocs_utils.

[cehbrecht]

• For the averqage across dimensions (Average), the dims parameter is defined as a dimension_parameter coming from roocs_utils. I was not sure if it was needed to add a shape_parameter to roocs_utils so I left it as is. If you feel like that would be preferable , please mention it in the PR and I'll add a shape_parameter to roocs_utils

@charlesgauthier-udm If the dimension_parameter works I would keep it. We want to move roocs_utils into clisops. We could refactor roocs_utils when it has moved.

[cehbrecht]

@charlesgauthier-udm tests are failing due to a new intake version. Do you like to add a restriction for intake within this PR?
https://github.com/roocs/rook/blob/b5c53321179c3fdfc97ae115798f09658daacbab/environment.yml#L32

... otherwise I will open a new PR to fix this.

[charlesgauthier-udm]

@charlesgauthier-udm tests are failing due to a new intake version.

Since the failing tests are not related to the polygon subsetting, I would suggest opening another PR, but if you don't have the time I can limit intake to 0.7.0 in this PR which seems to be working.

[cehbrecht]

@charlesgauthier-udm tests are failing due to a new intake version.

Since the failing tests are not related to the polygon subsetting, I would suggest opening another PR, but if you don't have the time I can limit intake to 0.7.0 in this PR which seems to be working.

@charlesgauthier-udm I will open a new PR for the intake issue :)

[cehbrecht]

@charlesgauthier-udm tests are working again on master (PR #115)

[cehbrecht]

@charlesgauthier-udm I can merge if this PR is ok for you.

[charlesgauthier-udm]

Yes, all good thank you for your review.