Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vendor: update libslirp #160

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 21, 2019

Conversation

giuseppe
Copy link
Collaborator

update to libslirp d171af3732a0610a25334b06b77fa547bd677918

I need it for https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp/libslirp/merge_requests/19

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano gscrivan@redhat.com

@rhatdan
Copy link

rhatdan commented Nov 21, 2019

LGTM

vendor.sh Outdated
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
#!/bin/bash
set -eux -o pipefail
# Aug 26, 2019
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please update date, then LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@AkihiroSuda
Copy link
Member

thanks, do you want to backport this to the v0.3 branch?

update to libslirp d171af3732a0610a25334b06b77fa547bd677918

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
@giuseppe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

thanks, do you want to backport this to the v0.3 branch?

we can just cut a new minor release, and in Fedora/RHEL we'll use it

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda merged commit 21fdece into rootless-containers:master Nov 21, 2019
@giuseppe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

thanks for the quick review! Could we cut a new release?

@AkihiroSuda
Copy link
Member

Let's cut a new release after libslirp v4.1.0 gets released: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp/libslirp/merge_requests/21

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants