Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explore EU BON for worms/pesi replacement #466

Closed
sckott opened this issue Oct 6, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

Explore EU BON for worms/pesi replacement #466

sckott opened this issue Oct 6, 2015 · 8 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@sckott
Copy link
Contributor

sckott commented Oct 6, 2015

http://cybertaxonomy.eu/eubon-utis/doc.html

Even if it doesn't have all capabilities of WORMS/PESI SOAP services, better than nothing.

They have COL too apparently, but COL services seem adequate.

@sckott sckott added this to the v0.7 milestone Oct 6, 2015
@eduardszoecs
Copy link
Member

Looks, very interesting.
From Germany...

It would be a pleasure for me to implement this ;)

@sckott
Copy link
Contributor Author

sckott commented Oct 6, 2015

Okay. I would probably make internal helper function to work with the service, then have exported functions for each of PESI and WORMS

The developer I heard from said that they use the SOAP services of these, and just turn it into REST service. I had done this but with a non open source tool so I gave up on it. And I wasn't sure if PESI/WORMS would give their blessing anyway.

@sckott
Copy link
Contributor Author

sckott commented Oct 7, 2015

We can mention this in the docs, from the EU BON via email

Pesi and WORMS do not need to be updated on our side since we are using the original PESI SOAP service from VLIZ. We do not cache their data on our servers. It is always life data from the original PESI checklist.

They also said this (another reason to not use Col through them)

For Col however this is different. This data is in fact imported in our servers. It is updated every time when the new annual checklist of Col is published.

@sckott
Copy link
Contributor Author

sckott commented Oct 13, 2015

not a super big hurry, but do you know when you'll be able to get to this @Edild ?

@eduardszoecs
Copy link
Member

At earliest next month (holidays ⛵ 😄 ) - you can also start with this...

@sckott sckott assigned sckott and eduardszoecs and unassigned sckott Oct 14, 2015
@sckott
Copy link
Contributor Author

sckott commented Oct 14, 2015

assigned to you, if we need to push next version before its done no worries, can just push to next milestone

@sckott sckott assigned sckott and unassigned eduardszoecs Nov 22, 2015
sckott added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2015
sckott added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2015
@sckott
Copy link
Contributor Author

sckott commented Nov 26, 2015

No paging is done right now on their side, so they only return the first chunk of up to 50 results, make note in docs

they said they'd add paging later, as early as Dec

@sckott
Copy link
Contributor Author

sckott commented Nov 29, 2015

closing for now, some work to do still, but waiting on changes in their API

@sckott sckott closed this as completed Nov 29, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants