Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 19, 2021. It is now read-only.

#rstats community #63

Closed
ShanEllis opened this issue Apr 27, 2017 · 15 comments
Closed

#rstats community #63

ShanEllis opened this issue Apr 27, 2017 · 15 comments

Comments

@ShanEllis
Copy link

While maybe not exactly a project, something I'd love to chat more with people at the unconf about is how to make sure the #rstats community is looking ahead and including both concepts that and individuals who may not otherwise be on the community's radar. For example:

  1. ensuring that we're not missing tools/ideas/concepts that exist in related communities due to any possible tunnel vision from interacting primarily with R-people? (I am totally guilty of this, so I want to know what else is out there! What am I missing? What should I be doing to be more well-rounded?)
  2. Keeping up with the community on twitter is a lot of fun and there are a lot of rockstars who are super active..which makes this community SO awesome...but are we missing people who may not be on twitter? Is there a better way to include newcomers in conversations? What can I do to help (even though I'm a ~newcomer myself)?
@stefaniebutland
Copy link
Member

As rOpenSci's Community Manager, I 100% support this and appreciate @ShanEllis for adding it as an issue.

For those who might be sheepish about stating their opinions here for all to see, would great if people just identified themselves here as being interested in talking / listening about this. Good way for us to look for each other at unconf!

@sckott
Copy link
Contributor

sckott commented Apr 27, 2017

Great idea @ShanEllis !

@jules32
Copy link

jules32 commented Apr 27, 2017

I'm definitely interested!

@stefaniebutland
Copy link
Member

@jules32 I was going to ping you about this to channel the community manager in you! Glad you beat me to it

@eringrand
Copy link

I am also interested in chatting about this. :)

@karthik
Copy link
Member

karthik commented Apr 27, 2017

Count me in.

@bzkrouse
Copy link

Great idea! I'm interested too! :)

@njtierney
Copy link

Sounds great, count me in as well! :)

@ateucher
Copy link
Member

I'm definitely in - I'm continuously trying to foster an engaged R community where I work (in government), and it is challenging.

@Ironholds
Copy link
Member

+10000

@jenniferthompson
Copy link

Definitely interested!

@nistara
Copy link

nistara commented May 16, 2017

I'm interested as well!

@jhollist
Copy link
Member

Also interested in this. Since I'll be remote, ping me on slack or twitter if the conversation gets going. I'm involved with pushing R at EPA and any ideas to help with that (and to keep us tied into the larger community) will be most welcome!

@revodavid
Copy link

I'd love to be part of this discussion.

@stefaniebutland
Copy link
Member

For the record, @ShanEllis wrote up the unconf17 discussion for the rOpenSci blog: https://ropensci.org/blog/blog/2017/06/23/community

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests