New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#rstats community #63

Closed
ShanEllis opened this Issue Apr 27, 2017 · 15 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
@ShanEllis

ShanEllis commented Apr 27, 2017

While maybe not exactly a project, something I'd love to chat more with people at the unconf about is how to make sure the #rstats community is looking ahead and including both concepts that and individuals who may not otherwise be on the community's radar. For example:

  1. ensuring that we're not missing tools/ideas/concepts that exist in related communities due to any possible tunnel vision from interacting primarily with R-people? (I am totally guilty of this, so I want to know what else is out there! What am I missing? What should I be doing to be more well-rounded?)
  2. Keeping up with the community on twitter is a lot of fun and there are a lot of rockstars who are super active..which makes this community SO awesome...but are we missing people who may not be on twitter? Is there a better way to include newcomers in conversations? What can I do to help (even though I'm a ~newcomer myself)?
@stefaniebutland

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@stefaniebutland

stefaniebutland Apr 27, 2017

Collaborator

As rOpenSci's Community Manager, I 100% support this and appreciate @ShanEllis for adding it as an issue.

For those who might be sheepish about stating their opinions here for all to see, would great if people just identified themselves here as being interested in talking / listening about this. Good way for us to look for each other at unconf!

Collaborator

stefaniebutland commented Apr 27, 2017

As rOpenSci's Community Manager, I 100% support this and appreciate @ShanEllis for adding it as an issue.

For those who might be sheepish about stating their opinions here for all to see, would great if people just identified themselves here as being interested in talking / listening about this. Good way for us to look for each other at unconf!

@sckott

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sckott

sckott Apr 27, 2017

Member

Great idea @ShanEllis !

Member

sckott commented Apr 27, 2017

Great idea @ShanEllis !

@jules32

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jules32

jules32 Apr 27, 2017

I'm definitely interested!

jules32 commented Apr 27, 2017

I'm definitely interested!

@stefaniebutland

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@stefaniebutland

stefaniebutland Apr 27, 2017

Collaborator

@jules32 I was going to ping you about this to channel the community manager in you! Glad you beat me to it

Collaborator

stefaniebutland commented Apr 27, 2017

@jules32 I was going to ping you about this to channel the community manager in you! Glad you beat me to it

@eringrand

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@eringrand

eringrand Apr 27, 2017

I am also interested in chatting about this. :)

eringrand commented Apr 27, 2017

I am also interested in chatting about this. :)

@karthik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@karthik

karthik Apr 27, 2017

Member

Count me in.

Member

karthik commented Apr 27, 2017

Count me in.

@bzkrouse

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bzkrouse

bzkrouse Apr 27, 2017

Great idea! I'm interested too! :)

bzkrouse commented Apr 27, 2017

Great idea! I'm interested too! :)

@njtierney

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@njtierney

njtierney Apr 28, 2017

Sounds great, count me in as well! :)

njtierney commented Apr 28, 2017

Sounds great, count me in as well! :)

@ateucher

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ateucher

ateucher Apr 28, 2017

Member

I'm definitely in - I'm continuously trying to foster an engaged R community where I work (in government), and it is challenging.

Member

ateucher commented Apr 28, 2017

I'm definitely in - I'm continuously trying to foster an engaged R community where I work (in government), and it is challenging.

@Ironholds

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Ironholds

Ironholds Apr 30, 2017

Member

+10000

Member

Ironholds commented Apr 30, 2017

+10000

@jenniferthompson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jenniferthompson

jenniferthompson May 12, 2017

Definitely interested!

jenniferthompson commented May 12, 2017

Definitely interested!

@nistara

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nistara

nistara May 16, 2017

I'm interested as well!

nistara commented May 16, 2017

I'm interested as well!

@jhollist

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jhollist

jhollist May 23, 2017

Member

Also interested in this. Since I'll be remote, ping me on slack or twitter if the conversation gets going. I'm involved with pushing R at EPA and any ideas to help with that (and to keep us tied into the larger community) will be most welcome!

Member

jhollist commented May 23, 2017

Also interested in this. Since I'll be remote, ping me on slack or twitter if the conversation gets going. I'm involved with pushing R at EPA and any ideas to help with that (and to keep us tied into the larger community) will be most welcome!

@revodavid

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@revodavid

revodavid May 25, 2017

I'd love to be part of this discussion.

revodavid commented May 25, 2017

I'd love to be part of this discussion.

@stefaniebutland

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@stefaniebutland

stefaniebutland Aug 9, 2017

Collaborator

For the record, @ShanEllis wrote up the unconf17 discussion for the rOpenSci blog: https://ropensci.org/blog/blog/2017/06/23/community

Collaborator

stefaniebutland commented Aug 9, 2017

For the record, @ShanEllis wrote up the unconf17 discussion for the rOpenSci blog: https://ropensci.org/blog/blog/2017/06/23/community

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment