Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(udp_socket): Optional local_ip #8

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 5, 2018
Merged

feat(udp_socket): Optional local_ip #8

merged 1 commit into from Feb 5, 2018

Conversation

reinzor
Copy link
Member

@reinzor reinzor commented Feb 5, 2018

Optional local ip specification that is used for binding. Default is still 0.0.0.0 so we will not break the API.

Motivation for this pull request is the use of this library in the omron_os32_driver package. The 0.0.0.0 binding prevents using multiple scanners on different interfaces, as described in ros-drivers/omron#12

@andreucm
Copy link

andreucm commented Feb 5, 2018

Hi reinzor!

Very similar implementation we did 2 months ago here:
beta-robots@68f30ec

Just wanted to do PR this week, after extensive testing with a pair of motor drives running simultaneously with RPI of about 20ms. It works fine.

Thanks

Andreu

@reinzor
Copy link
Member Author

reinzor commented Feb 5, 2018

Hi @andreucm,

I did look for PR before creating one but I did not inspect all the forks ;). Anyhow, good that we came up with the same implementation :)

@mikepurvis
Copy link
Member

Looks great, thanks.

@mikepurvis mikepurvis merged commit b5da132 into ros-drivers:indigo-devel Feb 5, 2018
@reinzor
Copy link
Member Author

reinzor commented Feb 21, 2018

Can a maintainer make a new release?

@mikepurvis
Copy link
Member

mikepurvis commented Apr 12, 2018

Done. Sorry for the exceptionally long delay. As in ros-drivers/omron#14 (comment), this repo is up for adoption if you'd like to make your own releases at a cadence which better suits you. :)

Indigo: ros/rosdistro#17426

Kinetic: ros/rosdistro#17427

Melodic: ros/rosdistro#17428

@JoeyR JoeyR mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants