Sc 10279/tenant update

[daniellemaxwell]

Scope of changes

Implementation of Tenant Update API definition on the client-side.

Fixes SC-10279

Type of change

• new feature
• bug fix
• documentation
• testing
• technical debt
• other (describe)

Acceptance criteria

Describe how reviewers can test this change to be sure that it works correctly. Add a checklist if possible.

Author checklist

• I have manually tested the change and/or added automation in the form of unit tests or integration tests
• I have updated the dependencies list
• I have recompiled and included new protocol buffers to reflect changes I made
• I have added new test fixtures as needed to support added tests
• Check this box if a reviewer can merge this pull request after approval (leave it unchecked if you want to do it yourself)
• I have moved the associated Shortcut story to "Ready for Review"

Reviewer(s) checklist

• Any new user-facing content that has been added for this PR has been QA'ed to ensure correct grammar, spelling, and understandability.

[shortcut-integration]

This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #10279: Tenant Resource Update API.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #55 (2724413) into main (8c14028) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #55      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   47.48%   47.45%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          52       52              
  Lines        3637     3652      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits         1727     1733       +6     
- Misses       1714     1720       +6     
- Partials      196      199       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	47.45% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...om/rotationalio/ensign/pkg/tenant/api/v1/client.go	42.96% <0.00%> (-0.18%)	⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[daniellemaxwell]

@bbengfort I resolved merged conflicts for this PR so the changes made in #51 also appear. You can review that one first and then take a look at this one.

[bbengfort]

Looks good! One small comment and it should be good to go!