New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix incorrect handling richdeps in buildep (RhBug:1756902) #362
Conversation
Solver must decide whether richdeps that has no matches is required or it can be skipped. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756902
@rh-atomic-bot try |
Solver must decide whether richdeps that has no matches is required or it can be skipped. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756902 Closes: #362 Approved by: <try>
It works on the reproducer. However on
It prints:
which does not give hint what is wrong. :( |
I've applied this patch on top of the Fedora's 4.0.9-1.fc30 and reinstalled python3-dnf-plugins-core and dnf-plugins-core.
Works fine:
Even if the package exists:
It doesn't install it:
However, when the depndency is broken:
The output is cryptic:
|
💔 Test failed - status-papr |
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
Solver must decide whether richdeps that has no matches is required or it can be skipped. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756902 Closes: #362 Approved by: <try>
In case of dependency problems, the output is generated by libsolv, therefore the report issue cannot be resolved by patch in dnf. I have a plan to create an issue on libsolv. |
☀️ Test successful - status-papr |
Is there a follow-up libsolv issue? |
@hroncok Sorry Miro, not yet (about missing details in error). But there is a plan. |
Solver must decide whether richdeps that has no matches is required or
it can be skipped.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756902