Updateinfo direct command and verbose list (RhBug:1801092) #1607
Conversation
|
We've discussed this before and it is perhaps subjective, but I'm not convinced hooking additional output data into Would |
|
It probably is subjective, I would rather have catch-all Nevertheless I am fine with |
|
Apart from the missing documentation LGTM... |
kontura
force-pushed
the
updateinfo_verbose
branch
from
98e5a5a
to
85b10ee
Compare
|
Updated the docs. |
|
Congratulations! One of the builds has completed. 🍾 You can install the built RPMs by following these steps:
Please note that the RPMs should be used only in a testing environment. |
|
Didn't this have another commit that was removing a You've rebased while pushing the last change so I can't check the diff there... |
|
@m-blaha I see, thanks! |
|
📌 Commit 85b10ee has been approved by |
| information (``--info``). When the ``-v`` option is used with ``--info``, the | ||
| information is even more detailed. | ||
| information (``--info``). The ``-v`` option extends the output. When | ||
| used with ``--info`` the information is even more detailed. When used |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
... used with
--info, the information is ...
(Add a comma)
| information is even more detailed. | ||
| information (``--info``). The ``-v`` option extends the output. When | ||
| used with ``--info`` the information is even more detailed. When used | ||
| with ``--list`` additional column with date of last advisory update is added. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
... with
--list, an additional column with date of the last advisory update is added.
|
☀️ Test successful - status-papr |
This changes the output of
updateinfo listcommand in verbose mode, while someone might depend on that I think its fine because the original behavior is still present in non verbose mode.(The first commit also fixes a bug with direct commands)
Tests:
rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack#809
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801092