New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Module multistream conflict #1700
Module multistream conflict #1700
Conversation
Congratulations! One of the builds has completed. 🍾 You can install the built RPMs by following these steps:
Please note that the RPMs should be used only in a testing environment. |
@@ -415,7 +417,13 @@ def _create_module_dict_and_enable(self, module_list, enable=True): | |||
if len(streamDict) > 1: | |||
if moduleState != STATE_DEFAULT and moduleState != STATE_ENABLED \ | |||
and moduleState != STATE_DISABLED: | |||
raise EnableMultipleStreamsException(moduleName) | |||
streams_str = "', '".join( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, why the nested quotes? Shouldn't stream names be composed of characters which don't require quoting?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I use 4 streams ('8', '10', '11', '12')
to make it similar with other part of message ('name'
, 'argument'
)
Please add bug reference (RhBug:1814831) to the commit message subject. |
The new message will contain information about related argument and matched streams. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814831
aaaf2a1
to
d98d1d3
Compare
Thanks for comments |
Thanks, LGTM! |
📌 Commit d98d1d3 has been approved by |
The new message will contain information about related argument and matched streams. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814831 Closes: #1700 Approved by: m-blaha
Closes: #1700 Approved by: m-blaha
💔 Test failed - status-papr |
One ot the tests failed ( |
It is possible the test failed because I have merged the reposync code just after the CI started running here, so it didn't use the new code in dnf but it did use the new test. Lets try again to make sure. @rh-atomic-bot retry |
The new message will contain information about related argument and matched streams. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814831 Closes: #1700 Approved by: m-blaha
Closes: #1700 Approved by: m-blaha
💔 Test failed - status-papr |
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
Closes: #1700 Approved by: m-blaha
☀️ Test successful - status-papr |
Requires tests: rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack#923