You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
%config(missingok) is documented, however, %missingok is not. Presumably there is at minimum a lot of overlap, but it is unclear if there are any distinctions in when and how they should be used.
vattrtest.spec only tests %missingok, can I presume that they are equivalent in function? Is one or the other considered better syntax?
Or does %config(missingok) also set the flag marking a file as configuration, while %missingok does not? If so, when is that useful?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's just one flag for it all (RPMFILE_MISSINGOK) so %config(missingok) equals %config %missingok. The standalone %missingok was only added in 2016 (8efe51e) so relatively late.
%config(missingok) is documented, however, %missingok is not. Presumably there is at minimum a lot of overlap, but it is unclear if there are any distinctions in when and how they should be used.
vattrtest.spec only tests %missingok, can I presume that they are equivalent in function? Is one or the other considered better syntax?
Or does %config(missingok) also set the flag marking a file as configuration, while %missingok does not? If so, when is that useful?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: