You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Anaconda we have metapackages (anaconda, anaconda-install-env-deps, anaconda-install-img-deps) that shouldn't make the check fail.
Like in rpminspect-fedora -v -T emptyrpm anaconda-35.11-1.fc35
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rvykydal
changed the title
RFE: Add ability to exclude subpackages in emptyrpm test
RFE: Add ability to exclude subpackages in emptyrpm test
Apr 9, 2021
rvykydal
changed the title
RFE: Add ability to exclude subpackages in emptyrpm test
RFE: Add ability to exclude subpackages in emptyrpm test
Apr 9, 2021
OK, I have a patch for the emptyrpm inspection where you can list expected empty RPMs in the rpminspect.yaml file. For anaconda, I did this locally and ran rpminspect again:
rpminspect will still report the empty payloads, but they will be classified as INFO and it will say the empty payload is expected per the configuration file.
Some packages build meta packages which have empty payloads but serve
as a way to control what packages are installed. This patch adds a
way to list the expected empty RPMs so the emptyrpm inspection still
runs, but does not fail when it encounters expected empty packages.
Signed-off-by: David Cantrell <dcantrell@redhat.com>
In Anaconda we have metapackages (anaconda, anaconda-install-env-deps, anaconda-install-img-deps) that shouldn't make the check fail.
Like in
rpminspect-fedora -v -T emptyrpm anaconda-35.11-1.fc35
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: