You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Summary: Does/Should rspec sort the spec file list prior to acting on them?
Detail:
I'm running rake spec on a windows server. The windows server has a problem that I am trying to figure out. It is not returning the directory list in sort sequence. I discovered this when I migrated a gem to this server and ran spec. It executed the files in the sequence acquired from windows. My spec's are prefixed 01-, 02-, etc... to ensure that they execute in a specified order. Unfortunately, because of the windows presentation of files not in sort sequence, rspec is throwing all kinds of errors.
I know I have a problem to fix with the windows server, however, I'm wondering if rspec should sort the file list internally, as a safety play, prior to acting on the files. That would protect itself from these kind of anomalies.
dvn - I maybe totally whack on this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No responses to this in a year leads me to believe this is not an issue for most users. Suggest closing it, it can always be re-opened if other people run into the same issue.
Summary: Does/Should rspec sort the spec file list prior to acting on them?
Detail:
I'm running rake spec on a windows server. The windows server has a problem that I am trying to figure out. It is not returning the directory list in sort sequence. I discovered this when I migrated a gem to this server and ran spec. It executed the files in the sequence acquired from windows. My spec's are prefixed 01-, 02-, etc... to ensure that they execute in a specified order. Unfortunately, because of the windows presentation of files not in sort sequence, rspec is throwing all kinds of errors.
I know I have a problem to fix with the windows server, however, I'm wondering if rspec should sort the file list internally, as a safety play, prior to acting on the files. That would protect itself from these kind of anomalies.
dvn - I maybe totally whack on this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: