Indent Level Headings in TOC (#1235) #1243
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RLesur
changed the title
|
Thanks a lot! I was wonder if there was a more parsimonious way to write the CSS that makes use of the natural parent-child relationships of different levels of headers, instead of relying on the attribute |
RLesur
added a commit
to RLesur/rmarkdown
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2018
|
I modified the PR. It now uses parent-child relationships, but the code is not very parsimonious 🙄 |
|
is this still open? if it is, is there a workaround to indenting 3rd/4th level? |
…se it forces all items to have the same amount of indent; then define different indent for each level of sub-items
yihui
force-pushed
the
bugfix/toc-indent-level3-heading
branch
from
7de9c16
to
07213d4
Compare
|
@mattaws Please try the development version here. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is a proposition to issue #1235.
Romain Lesur