Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RD>Settings>Indenter Settings #2831

Closed
IvenBach opened this issue Mar 10, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

RD>Settings>Indenter Settings #2831

IvenBach opened this issue Mar 10, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Identifies work items for known bugs feature-settings user-interface This issue explicitly relates to the visible interface of Rubberduck.

Comments

@IvenBach
Copy link
Member

Clicking on a link in the example brings up a window, can't navigate Back. You have to click on another settings option then back to Indenter to have it show the example again.

@comintern comintern added bug Identifies work items for known bugs feature-settings user-interface This issue explicitly relates to the visible interface of Rubberduck. labels Mar 10, 2017
@comintern comintern self-assigned this Mar 10, 2017
@comintern
Copy link
Contributor

Just to be clear, clicking the hidden hyperlinks does this (at least in Windows 10):

untitled

Changing the settings view to something else and then coming back resets it to the indenter settings (unclear what happens to the browser...). I'm almost positive that they opened in an external browser window on my Windows 7 VM at home. Is this screenshot above similar to the behavior that you're getting?

@IvenBach
Copy link
Member Author

Yes. That's the same as what I'm having happen.

@retailcoder
Copy link
Member

So we need to start a process that the given url then... or drop the links

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Identifies work items for known bugs feature-settings user-interface This issue explicitly relates to the visible interface of Rubberduck.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants