-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 520
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixing issues with a HEREDOC entry in git.status #385
Conversation
* fixing status#pretty using <<~ because we only maintain on Ruby 2.3+ now * fixing a rake warning about branch not using a decomposed argument Signed-off-by: Vern Burton <me@vernburton.com>
Signed-off-by: Vern Burton <me@vernburton.com>
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At first I was concerned that dropping older versions of Ruby should require a MAJOR version bump. After some reading, I think it is something to consider, but might not be necessary.
Here is the discussion I found helpful:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ruby/comments/7vtceq/when_is_it_okay_to_drop_support_for_ruby_versions/
@jcouball - I don't have an argument either way, I would be fine with a MINOR. The change in the gemspec should prevent |
Let's let this PR go with just a patch version bump. By semver definition, that is all that is needed. |
any status on this? |
Your checklist for this pull request
馃毃Please review the guidelines for contributing to this repository.
Description
fix #384
Removes `#strip_heredoc
This change breaks Ruby 2.2 or less and the
<<~
only exists in Ruby 2.3+. We are only testing Ruby 2.3 and later in Travis CI and I would argue that we should only be supporting those in the newer versions of the gem.Fixing branch for a message being used interpreted as an arg list and not as a decomposed argument