Enhanced RDoc for Enumerable

[BurdetteLamar]

Treats:

• #zip
• #take
• #take_while

[BurdetteLamar]

@jeremyevans, thoughts:

• Some of the dummy arguments to blocks could be more helpful; e.g. i or pair instead of element.
• No method name has 'element', but a couple have 'entry' or 'entries'. Should we be saying 'entry' throughout?

[jeremyevans]

Looks good! Only a couple of minor changes requested for the zip call-seq.

[BurdetteLamar]

@jeremyevans, thoughts:

* Some of the dummy arguments to blocks could be more helpful;  e.g. i or pair instead of element.

* No method name has 'element', but a couple have 'entry' or 'entries'.  Should we be saying 'entry' throughout?

@jeremyevans, any thoughts on these?

[jeremyevans]

@jeremyevans, thoughts:

* Some of the dummy arguments to blocks could be more helpful;  e.g. i or pair instead of element.

* No method name has 'element', but a couple have 'entry' or 'entries'.  Should we be saying 'entry' throughout?

@jeremyevans, any thoughts on these?

No strong feelings about either.

[jeremyevans]

The Miscellaneous checks CI is failing due to trailing spaces added in the zip call-seq, so you need to fix that before merging:

enum.c:3171: *    zip(*other_enums) → array
enum.c:3172: *    zip(*other_enums) {|array| ... } → nil

After that is fixed and CI passes, OK to merge without further review.

[JuPlutonic]

Please add space between first key and value

[BurdetteLamar]

Added.

[JuPlutonic]

a variable not needed in these two lines, please remove it.

[BurdetteLamar]

Removed.