Refactor getclassvariable #5137
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eileencodes
requested review from
maximecb,
tenderlove and
XrXr
as code owners
We only need the cref when we have a cache miss so don't look it up until we
need it. This speeds up class variable reads in the interpreter but
also simplifies the jit code.
Benchmarks for master vs this branch (without yjit):
Before:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
read a cvar 1.276M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
read a cvar 12.596M (± 1.7%) i/s - 63.781M in 5.064902s
```
After:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
read a cvar 1.336M i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
read a cvar 13.114M (± 3.6%) i/s - 65.488M in 5.000584s
```
Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@ruby-lang.org>
eileencodes
force-pushed
the
refactor-getcvar
branch
from
2e8af52
to
14b26e2
Compare
maximecb
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2021
XrXr
reviewed
Nov 17, 2021
rb_vm_getclassvariable signature has changed and we don't need rb_vm_get_cref.
eileencodes
added a commit
to eileencodes/ruby
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2021
We only need the cref when we have a cache miss so don't look it up until we
need it. This likely speeds up class variable writes in the interpreter but
also simplifies the jit code.
Before
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
write a cvar 192.280k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
write a cvar 1.915M (± 3.5%) i/s - 9.614M in 5.026694s
```
After
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
write a cvar 216.308k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
write a cvar 2.140M (± 3.1%) i/s - 10.815M in 5.058079s
```
Followup to ruby#5137
maximecb
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2021
We only need the cref when we have a cache miss so don't look it up until we
need it. This likely speeds up class variable writes in the interpreter but
also simplifies the jit code.
Before
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
write a cvar 192.280k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
write a cvar 1.915M (± 3.5%) i/s - 9.614M in 5.026694s
```
After
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
write a cvar 216.308k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
write a cvar 2.140M (± 3.1%) i/s - 10.815M in 5.058079s
```
Followup to #5137
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We only need the cref when we have a cache miss so don't look it up until we
need it. This speeds up class variable reads in the interpreter but
also simplifies the jit code.
Benchmarks for master vs this branch (without yjit):
Before:
After:
Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson tenderlove@ruby-lang.org
cc/ @tenderlove