This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 14, 2021. It is now read-only.
bundle info prints gem metadata #7376
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This provides more information about the gem to developers. For example: bundle info rspec-mocks * rspec-mocks (3.8.1) Summary: rspec-mocks-3.8.1 Homepage: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks Documentation: https://rspec.info/documentation/ Source Code: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks Changelog: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/blob/v3.8.1/Changelog.md Bug Tracker: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/issues Mailing List: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rspec Path: /opt/asdf/installs/ruby/2.6.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/rspec-mocks-3.8.1
|
Thanks for opening a pull request and helping make Bundler better! Someone from the Bundler team will take a look at your pull request shortly and leave any feedback. Please make sure that your pull request has tests for any changes or added functionality. We use Travis CI to test and make sure your change works functionally and uses acceptable conventions, you can review the current progress of Travis CI in the PR status window below. If you have any questions or concerns that you wish to ask, feel free to leave a comment in this PR or join our #bundler channel on Slack. For more information about contributing to the Bundler project feel free to review our CONTRIBUTING guide |
We can rely on it always being available since in our gemspec we set: required_rubygems_version >= 2.5.2
|
Let's do it! @bundlerbot r+ |
ghost
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2019
7376: bundle info prints gem metadata r=deivid-rodriguez a=orien ### What was the end-user problem that led to this PR? Rubygems has supported [gemspec metadata](https://guides.rubygems.org/specification-reference/#metadata) since version 2.0. I think it'd be great to display this information in response to the `bundle info <gem>` command. ### What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR? Added a check for `metadata`, outputting this extra information if it has been included with the gem release. For example: ``` > bundle info rspec-mocks * rspec-mocks (3.8.1) Summary: rspec-mocks-3.8.1 Homepage: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks Documentation: https://rspec.info/documentation/ Source Code: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks Changelog: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/blob/v3.8.1/Changelog.md Bug Tracker: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/issues Mailing List: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rspec Path: /opt/asdf/installs/ruby/2.6.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/rspec-mocks-3.8.1 ``` For better readability, we could align the values. However, this would mean a change to the existing info property lines (`Summary`, `Homepage`, `Path` and `Default`). Which would potentially break existing scripts that are coupled to the precise output. Co-authored-by: Orien Madgwick <_@orien.io>
Build succeeded |
ghost
merged commit
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was the end-user problem that led to this PR?
Rubygems has supported gemspec metadata since version 2.0. I think it'd be great to display this information in response to the
bundle info <gem>command.What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR?
Added a check for
metadata, outputting this extra information if it has been included with the gem release. For example:For better readability, we could align the values. However, this would mean a change to the existing info property lines (
Summary,Homepage,PathandDefault). Which would potentially break existing scripts that are coupled to the precise output.