Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify Ownership uniqueness errors when user already invited or owner #4119

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

martinemde
Copy link
Member

@martinemde martinemde commented Oct 9, 2023

@deivid-rodriguez had an experience adding a user to owners that wasn't ideal. I threw this together to try to make the error make more sense, since unconfirmed owners won't show up on the list of owners.

Copy link
Member

@deivid-rodriguez deivid-rodriguez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So much better! 💯

app/models/ownership.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #4119 (5e3ec5a) into master (122c723) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4119   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.90%   98.90%           
=======================================
  Files         276      276           
  Lines        6273     6281    +8     
=======================================
+ Hits         6204     6212    +8     
  Misses         69       69           
Files Coverage Δ
app/models/ownership.rb 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@martinemde martinemde changed the title Add better error messages for Ownership uniqueness validation Clarify Ownership uniqueness errors when user already invited or owner Oct 9, 2023
@martinemde martinemde merged commit e00bb7f into master Oct 9, 2023
16 checks passed
@martinemde martinemde deleted the owneship-validations branch October 9, 2023 22:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants