Skip to content

Conversation

@segiddins
Copy link
Contributor

This will allow creating, viewing, and deleting trusted publishers for a gem, gated behind a new API scope!

Open to feedback on specific test cases I should add.

I specifically am not adding an API for pending publishers yet, that can be done in a follow-up.

This will allow me to write a hack day tool to automatically set up trusted publishing for an existing gem!

@segiddins segiddins requested review from indirect and martinemde May 7, 2024 20:30
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.98%. Comparing base (2b56a2d) to head (ec15a32).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4690      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.09%   96.98%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         392      393       +1     
  Lines        8275     8322      +47     
==========================================
+ Hits         8035     8071      +36     
- Misses        240      251      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@segiddins segiddins force-pushed the segiddins/trusted-publishers-api branch from ec15a32 to 99379c1 Compare May 8, 2024 04:33
Signed-off-by: Samuel Giddins <segiddins@segiddins.me>
@segiddins segiddins force-pushed the segiddins/trusted-publishers-api branch from 99379c1 to 4554d83 Compare May 8, 2024 04:44
@segiddins segiddins merged commit eaf9bef into master May 8, 2024
@segiddins segiddins deleted the segiddins/trusted-publishers-api branch May 8, 2024 06:50
martinemde pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2024
Signed-off-by: Samuel Giddins <segiddins@segiddins.me>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants